What is NOT a context where Miranda rights apply?

Miranda rights are designed to protect a person's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during certain interactions with law enforcement. These rights must be read when an individual is in custody and subjected to interrogation.

In the context of this question, it is essential to identify scenarios where Miranda rights are not required. During a traffic stop, officers may stop and question individuals without necessarily needing to read them their Miranda rights, as long as the individual is not considered "in custody" in a legal sense. Traffic stops are typically brief, and the person is not subjected to the same level of restraint as in a custodial setting or during an interrogation.

Conversely, situations such as custodial interrogation, where an individual is both in custody and being questioned, and interrogation in custody necessitate the reading of Miranda rights, as those scenarios fit the criteria that require protection of the suspect's rights. Additionally, questioning a witness does not fall under the same protections, as the witness is not detained or subjected to the coercive environment that would necessitate the invocation of Miranda.

Thus, traffic stop questioning is recognized as a situation where Miranda rights do not apply, making it the correct answer in this context.