What differentiates a frisk from a full custodial search?

In the context of law enforcement and search procedures, a frisk and a full custodial search serve different purposes and are conducted under different circumstances. The correct reasoning for why the choice referencing the frisk looking for weapons and the full custodial search being a thorough examination is accurate can be linked to the fundamental principles of these actions.

A frisk, often referred to as a "stop and frisk," is a limited pat-down search that law enforcement officers conduct based primarily on the reasonable suspicion that an individual may be armed and dangerous. The primary objective here is to ensure the safety of the officer and others nearby by checking for weapons without the need for probable cause or a warrant. This search is not exhaustive; it focuses on the outer clothing of the individual to detect the presence of firearms or other dangerous instruments.

Conversely, a full custodial search is a more comprehensive investigation and is usually conducted after a person has been taken into custody and when there is probable cause to believe that the person may be in possession of weapons, evidence, or contraband. This type of search is thorough, allowing officers to examine the individual, their belongings, and typically includes a more invasive look for anything that could be hidden.

Thus, the distinction made in the correct answer highlights the