Stop and Frisk practices originate from which landmark case?

The practice of stop and frisk originates from the landmark case Terry v. Ohio. In this 1968 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that police officers are entitled to stop and briefly detain a person based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity. Furthermore, if the officer has a reasonable concern for their safety or the safety of others, they can conduct a limited frisk of the person’s outer clothing for weapons without a warrant. This ruling established the legal framework that allows law enforcement to engage in stop and frisk practices as a preventative measure, thus serving a significant role in policing strategies.

The other cases mentioned do not relate to stop and frisk practices. Miranda v. Arizona deals with the rights of individuals in police custody, specifically concerning the requirement for officers to inform individuals of their rights to silence and legal counsel. Roe v. Wade addresses the constitutional right to abortion, and Brown v. Board of Education is a historic decision that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional. Each of these cases addresses different legal principles and public issues, but none are linked to the stop and frisk doctrine established in Terry v. Ohio.